Meeting challenges downstream
Lyubka Katchakova, Deputy Minister of Environment and Water of Bulgaria and Head of the Delegation to the ICPDR, speaks about the benefits and responsibilities of EU membership, the value of the Joint Danube Survey 2, and efforts to improve wastewater management in Bulgaria.
Lyubka Katchakova, Deputy Minister of Environment and Water of Bulgaria and Head of the Delegation to the ICPDR.
In its continuing series, Danube watch presents portraits of the leaders whose passion and commitment actively steer IcPDR processes and help determine the future of the basin.
Danube watch: how has joining the eu affected
water issues in bulgaria?
Katchakova: This is very significant for the future
management of the water sector in the country. Even
before becoming a member of the EU this year, Bulgaria
harmonised its national legislation with the Acquis
Communautaire and began its implementation as part
of the negotiation process for accession. Now, as a
Member State, Bulgaria has access to the structural and
cohesion funds of EU aimed at reaching the European
standard for development specifically in the water
sector. The percentage of the population connected to
urban wastewater treatment plants (UWWTPs), level
of treatment, quality of the constructed collecting
system, these are all areas of the water sector in Bulgaria
that need significant improvement but due to the
membership in EU, those challenges have a positive
perspective.
Improvements will be seen not only in the wastewater sector, but also in the water supply sector. Although well developed in the past with a high percentage of population connected to a centralised water supply system, at present the water supply network is in poor condition and needs huge investments for renovation. In accordance with the EU’s ‘full water cycle approach’ of resolving problems in the water and the wastewater sector together, investments for improving the water sector are also included in the Operational Programme 2007–2013 for financing from the Cohesion fund.
Therefore, even though from a position of a country catching up with the rest of the EU Member States, Bulgaria has the positive perspective of reaching the European level in the water sector. Combining the obligations of different EU directives and taking intoconsideration the national policy for providing the public and the business with water in sufficient quality and quantity, the Bulgarian government has adopted a national strategy for management and development of the water sector aiming at the sustainable development of the water sector.
BULGARIA: FACTS AND FIGURES
Size of the country | 110,910 km² |
Area within the Danube River Basin |
46,930 km² |
Share of the total Danube River Basin |
around 5.9% |
Population | around 7.4 million |
Population in the Danube River Basin |
around 3.4 million |
Capital | Sofia |
Per-capita GDP | around €3,300 |
Main tributaries to the Danube |
Ogosta, Iskar, Vit, Osam, Yantra, Rusenski Lom |
Danube watch: how is bulgaria working to meet
the requirements of the eu urban waste water
Directive?
Katchakova: Since Bulgaria began implementing the
Urban Wastewater Directive very late, we were able to
negotiate transitional periods for the implementation
– the end of 2010 for all the agglomerations of above
10,000 population equivalent (PE) and the end of 2014
for those between 2000 and 10,000 PE. The challenge for Bulgaria is quite large, since at present there are
around 70 UWWTPs constructed, and 430 agglomerations
that fall within the Directive. Nevertheless,
Bulgaria is working on ensuring the implementation
of the Directive within the deadlines.
One more aspect of the implementation of the Directive is ensuring the removal of nitrogen and phosphorus in the treatment process of UWWTPs for agglomerations of above 10,000 PE where the recipient is a sensitive area. Unfortunately, most of the water bodies in Bulgaria, including the Danube River and the Black Sea, are sensitive areas. That requires more capital investments and higher operational costs for wastewater treatment plants to comply with the Directive.
Danube watch: The joint Danube survey 2 made a
stop in Ruse on september 19. how important is
this survey to bulgaria?
Katchakova: First, it was an excellent example for
cooperation between the different Danube countries.
A lot of preparation and cooperation between the
Secretariat and the Danube countries was done and
scientists and equipment from different countries
were brought together in order to make this survey
happen. Secondly, the result from the survey will
become an important tool for decision-making since
it will give a picture of the quality of the Danube
from the EU Water Framework Directive perspective.
Once we analyse the results, they will be used as the
necessary foundation for elaborating the programmes
of measures for the Danube Basin. As a country in the
lower course, Bulgaria is very interested in the survey
because the analysis of data can give answers about
possible sources of pollution that negatively affect the
quality of the Bulgarian part of the river.
On a national level, it was an important exercise for Bulgaria to bring together different national stakeholders and raise the public awareness of the importance of protecting the Danube River. Participants from different state organisations, business representatives and NGOs were invited to participate in a workshop where the importance of the Danube Survey and of the environmental policy in general was explained and emphasised. Students from a local university with environment-related majors were invited to step on board to see how scientists take samples and analyse them.
We hope that the Joint Danube Survey 2 will contribute to the efforts of all Danube countries in protecting the Danube River.
Thank you very much, Ms Katchakova!
HISTORY HIGHLIGHTS
The territory of Bulgaria has been inhabited since the earliest historical times. The Bulgars, a Central Asian Turkic tribe, merged with the local Slavic inhabitants in the late seventh century to form the first Bulgarian state. In following centuries, Bulgaria struggled with the Byzantine Empire to assert its place in the Balkans, but by the end of the 14th century the country was overrun by the Ottoman Turks, who controlled Bulgaria for nearly five centuries.
In 1876, the April Uprising broke out – the first significant and organised attempt at liberation from Ottoman domination. The bloody uprising was crushed by the Ottomans, but it drew the attention of European countries to the Bulgarian national crisis. In 1878, as a result of the Russian- Turkish War of Liberation, the Bulgarian State was restored, but the Congress of Berlin divided the Bulgarian territories into three parts.
Bulgaria sided with the central powers in World War I, subsequently losing a great part of its lands, and in World War II Bulgaria fought on the side of the Axis. After the war, Bulgaria fell within the Soviet sphere of influence and became a People’s Republic in 1946. Communist domination ended in 1990, when Bulgaria held its first multiparty election since World War II. A new constitution was adopted in 1991, and Bulgaria began moving toward a market economy. The country joined NATO in 2004 and the EU in 2007. Bulgaria has been a Contracting Party to the ICPDR since the Danube River Protection Convention was singed in Sophia in 1994.
Disclaimer
The information contained in the ICPDR website is intended to enhance public access to information about the ICPDR and the Danube River. The information is correct to the best of the knowledge of the ICPDR Secretariat. If errors are brought to our attention we will try to correct them.
The ICPDR, expert group members, nor other parties involved in preparation of information contained on this website cannot, however, be held responsible for the correctness and validity of the data and information provided, nor accept responsibility or liability for damages or losses arising directly or indirectly from the use of the information conveyed therein.
Only those documents clearly marked ICPDR documents reflect the position of the ICPDR.
Any links to other websites are provided for your convenience only. The ICPDR does not accept any responsibility for the accuracy, availability, or appropriateness to the user's purposes, of any information or services on any other website.
When using the information and material provided on this website, credit should be given to the ICPDR.